What is the average AFFF lawsuit settlement?

AFFF firefighting foam lawyers are still speculating on the exact amount that each plaintiff may receive in their AFFF lawsuit settlements. However, it’s safe to say that the AFFF firefighting foam <a class="editor-rtfLink" href="https://www.lezdotechmed.com/blog/mass-tort/afff-lawsuit-update/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">settlement amounts </a>will be very high. This is because the injuries caused by these chemicals are very serious, including cancer and other illnesses. By looking at previous MDLs, it’s possible to make some estimates on current AFFF firefighting foam lawsuit settlements. Top-tier plaintiffs could receive around $200,000 and $500,000. Second-tier plaintiffs could receive around $150,000 to $300,000, and third or lower tiers may receive $75,000 or less. While AFFF has been necessary for firefighting purposes, especially in managing fuel fires, it seems the environmental and physical dangers outweigh the advantages. The long-term health effects of exposure to these chemicals are now being taken into consideration, as well as the impact on the environment. There is a movement to find more environmentally friendly ways to extinguish fires, and it seems that AFFF may soon be a thing of the past. It’s hoped that these lawsuits will bring about a much-needed change in the way that AFFF is used and manufactured and that safer, more environmentally friendly products will be developed to take its place. In the meantime, it’s important for those who have been exposed to AFFF to be aware of the potential health risks and to monitor their health closely. Not sure if you can qualify for this lawsuit? Find out in as little as 60 seconds using our chat below for a free case evaluation.

Can you file a wrongful death claim for a loved one who died as a result of exposure to AFFF?

Yes, if your loved one died as a result of exposure to AFFF, you may be able to file a wrongful death claim against the manufacturer. These claims involve seeking compensation for the death of a loved one due to the negligence or recklessness of another party. You can expect different forms of compensation, such as medical and funeral expenses, loss of earnings and benefits, pain and suffering before death occurs, and loss of companionship. The deceased’s closest relatives typically have the first right to compensation in a wrongful death claim. Most often, this is the spouse, followed by the children if there is no existing spouse. If the deceased did not have a spouse or children, their parents might be able to get compensation through a wrongful death claim, particularly if the deceased contributed to their parents’ support—financially or physically.

Can you file a claim if you're not a firefighter?

Yes, you can still file a claim and get involved in AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits even if you’re not a firefighter. Although it’s true that firefighters may have had more direct AFFF exposure, many other people were also exposed to these harmful chemicals. For example, AFFF was commonly used at military bases, airports, and factories. Many claims in the firefighting foam lawsuit involve individuals who may have been exposed to AFFF through contaminated water etc., and subsequently developed cancer or other illnesses. To make a valid claim in the AFFF foam lawsuit, plaintiffs will need proof that they developed one of the cancers linked to AFFF exposure, such as prostate cancer or kidney or testicular cancer, and that they were exposed to AFFF firefighting foam chemicals. With an experienced attorney, you’ll need to collect occupation evidence of AFFF exposure, such as work history and work placements, etc. Medical records of your cancer diagnosis, such as lab tests, imaging and medical bills, will also need to be collated. The amount of compensation you’ll receive depends on a few factors, such as the extent of your AFFF foam exposure, your time of diagnosis and the severity of your illnesses. If you think you were exposed to AFFF firefighting foam, you can use our chatbot for a free case evaluation.

Why are manufacturers being sued in the AFFF Lawsuit?

Many cases in the AFFF lawsuit claim that AFFF manufacturers were aware of the dangers AFFF and the toxic chemicals posed, but they neglected to share this information to make a profit. If manufacturers fail to disclose known risks of their products, they may be held liable for injuries or damages suffered by users of those products, and this is the case with the AFFF firefighting foam lawsuit.

Which manufacturers are involved in the AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits?

The companies named in the AFFF lawsuits include: <ul> <li>3M</li> <li>Tyco Fire Products LP</li> <li>Chemguard Inc.</li> <li>Buckeye Fire Equipment Co.</li> <li>Chubb Fire.</li> <li>Kidde-Fenwal Inc.</li> <li>Dupont</li> <li>And more.</li> </ul> The AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits are seeking various forms of compensation for the damages that have been caused by aqueous film-forming foam, and the companies involved are in the process of defending themselves against these lawsuits.

Is AFFF still being used?

Yes, AFFF is still being used, but due to recent evidence resulting from the AFFF foam lawsuits, there has been a shift to reduce and eventually eliminate the use of AFFF firefighting foam. The U.S. military has also been working to phase out the use of AFFF due to the health and environmental risks associated with the chemicals in the foam. The AFFF firefighting foam lawsuit is still ongoing, and current regulations on AFFF usage vary from state to state. However, certain <a class="editor-rtfLink" href="https://www.michigan.gov/documents/pfasresponse/Firefighting_Foam_Poster_655070_7.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">guidelines</a> outline ways for fire protection officials and government agencies to comply slightly more with environmental and groundwater experts’ suggestions. Some of these guidelines state: <ul> <li>AFFF can only be used in extreme circumstances, specifically in: <ul> <li>Alcohol-based products</li> <li>Aviation incidents</li> <li>Hydrocarbon fires</li> </ul> </li> <li>In any other circumstance, an alternative that doesn’t include PFAS chemicals needs to be used, especially when it comes to fire safety and training.</li> </ul> These guidelines don’t completely stop the use of AFFF – however, they do lower exposure to large amounts of PFAS while still keeping people and buildings safe during a fire.

There is no definitive answer to this question, as different jurisdictions have different regulations regarding the use of AFFF. Some countries have banned the use of AFFF, while others have restricted its use. Overall, the general consensus is that AFFF firefighting foam should only be used in cases where other fire suppression methods are not effective. This widely used fire suppression foam has been confirmed by the U.S. <a class="editor-rtfLink" href="https://media.defense.gov/2022/Apr/05/2002970013/-1/-1/0/AFFF-TECHNOLOGIES-REPLACEMENT-AND-ALTERNATIVES-BRIEFING-FEB-2022.PDF" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Department of Defense</a> to be a major source of environmental contamination from PFAS. When AFFF is used to suppress a fire, the PFAS within the foam seeps into the environment and groundwater, contaminating anything in its path. So many states are reevaluating if they should allow AFFF, and some are taking measures to prohibit it. The Department of Defense has even set a deadline of <a class="editor-rtfLink" href="https://vanguard-fire.com/everything-you-need-to-know-about-afff/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">2024</a> for military organizations using firefighting foam containing PFAS to switch products.

What are the alternatives to AFFF?

There are various alternatives available, some with different or lower PFAS content than traditional AFFF foams. There are also several non-AFFF firefighting foam options available that don’t contain any PFAS, which are typically more expensive, but they don’t pose the same risks to human health and the environment. A few of these non-AFFF firefighting foam alternatives include: <h4>C6 Firefighting foam concentrates</h4> These products typically use a different fluorochemical called 6:2 Fluorotelomer alcohol, or C6 FTOH. C6 FTOH is structurally similar to PFAS, but it’s not as persistent in the environment, and it doesn’t build up in the human body as PFAS does. However, C6 FTOH can still contaminate drinking water if it’s not used properly. Firefighting foams containing C8 (a fluorosurfactant with a carbon chain length of eight) have begun to face legislation and regulation because the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has discovered that longer fluorosurfactants’ chains – those above six carbons – contain PFAS. However, Fluorosurfactants whose chains are shorter – at six or fewer carbons long- don’t pose the same risks. <h4>Fluorine-free foams</h4> Fluorine-free foam is a manmade alternative to traditional foams used for fire suppression. It contains surfactant blends and polysaccharides, which create a cooling blanket of bubbles when applied to fire fuels that prevent the spread of flames. Unlike other options, the fluorine-free foam does not contain PFAS. This gives it a clear environmental advantage, as it is less likely to contaminate its surroundings. <h4>Dry chemical agents</h4> Dry chemical agents are another fire suppressant option, which uses a chemical powder to extinguish flames. Pressurized dry chemical agents work by creating a barrier between the fuel and the oxygen in the air, starving the fire of its needed elements. One advantage of dry chemical agents is that they can be used on different types of fires, including those involving combustible liquids and energized electrical equipment. Another advantage is that they can be discharged through small orifices, making them effective in suppressing hard-to-reach fires. Still, many dry chemical agents are considered hazardous, so they must be used with caution.

What type of fire is AFFF used on?

AFFF is most effective on Class B and Class C fires, which involve flammable liquids or gases. This firefighting foam is often used for fuel fires, which are common in industrial and automotive settings. Fuel fires can be especially difficult to extinguish because the fuel often continues to feed the fire even after the initial flames have been extinguished. AFFF firefighting foam can help to quickly stifle these types of fires and prevent them from reigniting.

What is the difference between AFFF and FFFP?

Both are foam-based extinguishers, but Film-forming Fluoroprotein (FFFP) foams are better suited for reigning in hydrocarbon liquid fires and are formed with protein foam technology. FFFP foams can also be used unaspirated, which means they do not require a separate air supply. The protein-based composition of the foam gives it a high resistance to heat, meaning it can quickly snuff out fires. Additionally, the film formation properties help to rapidly knock down flames. Film forming Fluoroprotein foams excel in high-risk situations where hydrocarbons (crude oil, aviation kerosene, gasoline, and diesel fuel) are stored or transported. The rapid intervention vehicles at many airports and military bases use these products because they can quickly put out fires and provide postfire security with only a small amount of foam concentrate.

Is AFFF a carcinogen?

The PFAS found in AFFF is <a href="https://www.pfasfree.org.uk/about-pfas#:~:text=In%20the%20EU%2C%20official%20classifications,organs'%20(liver)%2040%20." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">carcinogenic</a>, which is why there is a link between firefighting foam, cancer, and other physical health issues. Human exposure to these chemicals puts individuals at an increased risk of developing cancer later on, as the PFAS don’t deteriorate or leave the body easily. In fact, these fire suppression chemicals can bind with proteins in the blood and stay in the body for years. Then, they can gradually build up in tissue over time until cancers form. As mentioned earlier, these chemicals in firefighting foam do not decompose and may take thousands of years to eliminate from groundwater and soil, according to research. What’s more, when firefighters are exposed to AFFF foam, they can end up with high levels of fluorinated compounds in their blood, which has been linked to kidney and testicular cancer, as well as thyroid disease.

What forms of cancer do the PFAS in AFFF firefighting foam cause?

The PFAS in AFFF firefighting foam is associated with a range of cancers, including: <ul> <li>Prostate Cancer</li> <li>Testicular Cancer</li> <li>Pancreatic Cancer</li> <li>Kidney Cancer</li> <li>Bladder Cancer</li> <li>Leukaemia</li> <li>Thyroid Cancer</li> </ul> Unfortunately, AFFF exposure doesn’t just cause cancer. It can also lead to fertility issues, liver damage, birth defects, and immune suppression.

AFFF Lawsuit: Firefighting Foam Cancer Lawsuit

Last Updated: October 29th, 2025

Written By:

Jessie Paluch

Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.

Legally Reviewed

This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLawsuit Info and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.

Fact-Checked

TruLawsuit Info does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact our team by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.

Key Takeaways:

AFFF (Aqueous Film-Forming Foam) used in firefighting contains toxic substances known as PFAS (Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl substances) which have been linked to serious health issues. This has led to numerous lawsuits seeking justice for victims and their families.
The AFFF lawsuit is not a class action but an MDL (Multidistrict Litigation), where cases are coordinated by a single judge for pretrial proceedings. As of September 2022, there are over 2,500 pending cases in the MDL AFFF lawsuit.
The lawsuits aim to hold manufacturers accountable for their actions and force them to change their practices with regard to AFFF. Victims are seeking compensation for injuries, medical expenses, and other serious damages.

AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit Overview

On this page, we’ll discuss:

An overview of the AFFF Lawsuit
Updates surrounding the ongoing AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit
The side effects caused by exposure to AFFF and PFAS
Average AFFF Lawsuit settlement amounts being projected
Who qualifies to file an AFFF firefighting foam cancer lawsuit

AFFF lawsuits involving firefighting foam exposure are occurring nationwide, with plaintiffs linking their serious health issues to this toxic chemical.

Read on to learn about these lawsuits, what AFFF is, and how you can get help if you’ve been affected.

Lawsuit Updates

September 2, 2025: September 2025 JPML Update

The AFFF firefighting foam lawsuit continues to grow as part of the multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the District of South Carolina.

From August to September 2025, the case count increased by 851, climbing from 12,064 to a total of 12,915 pending lawsuits.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and later developed cancer, contact an AFFF Lawyer from TruLawsuit Info for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation to see if you qualify for an AFFF Lawsuit.
August 18th, 2025: Kansas City Joins AFFF Lawsuit Over PFAS Contamination

Kansas City has filed a lawsuit in the AFFF multidistrict litigation (MDL) against chemical companies over PFAS contamination caused by firefighting foam.

The complaint targets the use of AFFF at facilities managed by Kansas City’s Aviation Department and KC Water, where PFAS exposure allegedly caused widespread environmental harm.

City officials are demanding compensation to cover testing, site remediation, regulatory compliance, and long-term infrastructure planning.

Mayor Quinton Lucas stated the city is acting to protect taxpayers from bearing cleanup costs, placing responsibility on manufacturers for decades of pollution.

As more cities and public entities join the AFFF litigation, pressure continues to mount on chemical companies over the alleged dangers and long-lasting impact of PFAS exposure.

August 1st, 2025: August 2025 JPML Update

Between July and August, 968 additional lawsuits were added to the AFFF firefighting foam MDL, raising the total case count to 12,064.

Plaintiffs claim long-term PFAS exposure through occupational use or contaminated environments has led to severe health issues.

While bellwether trials are being developed, parallel settlement talks are continuing in the background.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and later developed cancer, contact an AFFF Lawyer from TruLawsuit Info for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation to see if you qualify for an AFFF Lawsuit.
July 28th, 2025: Judge Grants Extension for AFFF Tier 2 Group B Case Selections

A federal judge has extended the deadline for selecting the next group of plaintiffs in the AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits.

On July 28, 2025, Judge Richard Gergel signed off on a joint request to push the decision deadline to August 4, 2025.

The extension gives both legal teams more time to agree on which cases will move forward for discovery in the Tier 2 Group B track of the multidistrict litigation.

So far, three cases have been selected—two involving ulcerative colitis and one with thyroid disease claims.

This process is part of a broader effort to organize the growing number of claims that link PFAS chemicals in firefighting foam to serious illnesses.

The original deadline of June 27 was moved due to ongoing negotiations.

Discovery for these cases is still set to close on September 12, 2025, unless further changes are made.

The outcome of these selections will play a key role in shaping future trials and potential settlement discussions.

July 23, 2025: Court Addresses Surge of Unfiled AFFF Lawsuits Ahead of First Bellwether Trial

The federal court overseeing AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits has called a special hearing for July 22, 2025, to address a growing number of unfiled injury claims.

According to a July 15 court order, U.S. District Judge Richard Gergel cited urgent updates from both plaintiffs and defense teams estimating that tens of thousands of viable personal injury claims remain unfiled.

This influx could overwhelm the litigation, which already includes over 11,000 cases centralized in South Carolina under MDL No. 2873.

The unfiled claims come as the court prepares for its first bellwether trial on October 20 and a mediation session on July 25.

Plaintiffs primarily include firefighters, veterans, and residents exposed to PFAS chemicals in contaminated drinking water.

Reported injuries include kidney cancer, thyroid disease, ulcerative colitis, and other life-altering illnesses.

The July 22 hearing will evaluate how the MDL can incorporate these anticipated filings while preserving the integrity of ongoing proceedings.

Lawyers representing affected individuals are strongly urged to file claims quickly to ensure eligibility for any future settlement or trial participation.

July 17th, 2025: House Bill Proposes Three-Year Extension for Military Use of AFFF

A recent amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) will allow the U.S. military to continue using aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) until fiscal year 2026, delaying the previously mandated phaseout by three years.

Originally, Congress required the Department of Defense to end AFFF use by October 1, 2023.

Introduced by Rep. Jack Bergman (R-MI), the amendment passed the House Armed Services Committee with a 55–2 vote.

Bergman cited military readiness concerns and emphasized the importance of accelerating PFAS cleanup near military bases during the transition to safer alternatives.

AFFF contains toxic per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which have been linked to cancer, thyroid disease, and reproductive issues.

These chemicals are highly persistent in the environment and resist natural breakdown.

Thousands of lawsuits across the country claim that AFFF contaminated groundwater and harmed firefighters, military personnel, and nearby communities.

These cases are part of a consolidated multidistrict litigation (MDL No. 2873) in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina.

The extension may impact timelines for AFFF elimination and could shape the future of PFAS-related litigation as cases continue to grow nationwide.

July 11th, 2025: DuPont Agrees to $27 Million Settlement in New York PFOA Water Contamination Case

DuPont has agreed to pay $27 million to settle claims linked to toxic PFOA contamination in Hoosick Falls, New York, resolving years of litigation over polluted drinking water.

Residents alleged that local water sources were contaminated by perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), a chemical used in firefighting foams and Teflon manufacturing.

The lawsuit, originally filed in 2016, focused on emissions from a nearby Teflon coating facility operated by Saint-Gobain and Honeywell.

DuPont, which supplied Teflon materials, and 3M, the manufacturer of PFOA, were later added as defendants.

This latest settlement includes $6 million for medical monitoring and brings the total compensation for plaintiffs to over $90 million.

Previous settlements by Saint-Gobain, Honeywell, and 3M totaled $65 million in 2021.

PFOA is a key chemical in aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) and has been linked to serious health risks such as kidney and testicular cancers.

This agreement adds to growing legal accountability over PFAS contamination across the U.S.

July 7, 2025: Is the Surge in AFFF Lawsuits a Sign of an Impending Global Settlement?

As of July 1, 2025, the Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF) multidistrict litigation (MDL No. 2873) has reached 11,096 active lawsuits—an increase of 705 cases in just one month.

This is among the largest monthly increases recorded since the litigation began in 2018.

The acceleration in new filings may signal a strategic push by plaintiffs’ attorneys who anticipate upcoming settlement discussions.

Many legal observers believe this surge could indicate that a global settlement may be on the horizon.

The AFFF MDL is being overseen by Judge Richard Gergel in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina.

Plaintiffs allege that exposure to toxic PFAS chemicals in firefighting foam caused cancer, other serious health issues, and extensive environmental harm.

Although no official settlement has been announced, the recent spike in lawsuits highlights mounting pressure to secure claims as the litigation progresses toward potential resolution.

July 1st, 2025: July 2025 JPML Update

The AFFF firefighting foam MDL has expanded to 10,520 cases as of July 1, 2025—an increase of 129 claims in just one month.

These lawsuits focus on alleged health risks tied to PFAS chemicals found in AFFF, used extensively by firefighters, military personnel, and airport crews.

The litigation is moving forward with active bellwether case preparation.

Parties are now conducting detailed discovery that will help determine the order of upcoming trials.

While certain defendants remain in settlement talks, no comprehensive resolution has yet been finalized.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and later developed cancer, contact an AFFF Lawyer from TruLawsuit Info for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation to see if you qualify for an AFFF Lawsuit.
June 16th, 2025 Study Reveals Firefighting Foam Chemicals May Accelerate Cancer and Reduce Chemotherapy Effectiveness

A June 6 study in the Journal of Environmental Sciences highlights new dangers linked to PFAS exposure from firefighting foam, particularly in cancer progression and chemotherapy resistance.

Scientists from Poland’s Medical University of Gdańsk examined how PFOA and PFOS—two common PFAS chemicals—affect prostate cancer treatment with chemotherapy drugs cabazitaxel and docetaxel.

Their findings show that PFAS not only promote cancer cell growth at low concentrations but also alter how effective chemotherapy drugs are.

For example, PFOS sometimes boosted the toxicity of docetaxel, but in other scenarios, it weakened the drug’s effects.

PFOA also influenced how prostate cancer cells responded to cabazitaxel.

Normal prostate cells appeared even more vulnerable to PFAS exposure than cancerous ones, raising broader safety concerns.

This study could bolster legal arguments in AFFF lawsuits, as it adds to growing evidence that PFAS chemicals directly impact cancer outcomes.

June 9th, 2025: New Study Confirms Elevated PFAS Exposure in Firefighters, Raises Alarms for Healthcare Workers

A new study from University of Arizona Health Sciences confirms that firefighters carry the highest levels of toxic PFAS in their blood, deepening concerns about the health risks tied to AFFF foam and PFAS-laced turnout gear.

The research, conducted under the AZ HEROES study, examined nearly 2,000 essential workers and is the first of its kind to compare PFAS exposure across job types.

Firefighters exhibited the most elevated levels of PFHxS, PFOS, and PFHpS—chemicals widely used in firefighting equipment.

Alarmingly, the study also identified healthcare workers as an emerging at-risk group, with measurable levels of PFHpS, PFUnA, Sb-PFOA, and PFDoA found in their systems.

This suggests that medical equipment and protective clothing may be an unexpected source of PFAS exposure in clinical environments.

These findings support the growing body of evidence used in PFAS-related lawsuits and may expand legal focus beyond firefighting to include the healthcare sector.

June 3rd, 2025: New Study Highlights Persistent PFAS Exposure from AFFF Foam in Firefighters

From July 2020 to April 2023, researchers studied nearly 2,000 emergency personnel and found that firefighters had the highest sustained PFAS levels—specifically PFHxS, PFOS, and PFHpS—compared to other essential workers.

While PFAS levels declined for most respondents, firefighters’ exposure remained steady.

The prolonged presence of PFAS in firefighter blood has been linked to repeated use of Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF), a product now known to contain dangerous chemicals.

This study adds weight to allegations that years of exposure to AFFF and PFAS-treated gear have caused cancer and other illnesses among firefighters.

Plaintiffs in the AFFF litigation argue that manufacturers failed to warn them of the long-term health risks.

Calls are growing within the fire service for immediate adoption of PFAS-free foams and safer gear, as scientific evidence continues to mount.

June 2nd, 2025: June 2025 JPML Update

The AFFF MDL has added 1,049 new lawsuits over the past month, bringing the total number of cases to 10,391.

This reflects a rise of 2,758 new filings since the beginning of 2025.

The litigation is moving forward in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina.

The first bellwether trial—centered on kidney and testicular cancer claims—is scheduled for October 6, 2025.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and later developed cancer, contact an AFFF Lawyer from TruLawsuit Info for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation to see if you qualify for an AFFF Lawsuit.
May 28th, 2025: Plaintiffs Push to Prioritize Three Kidney Cancer Cases in Upcoming AFFF Bellwether Trials

Plaintiffs in the AFFF multidistrict litigation (MDL) have formally requested that three kidney cancer lawsuits be tried separately in the first round of bellwether trials, scheduled to begin on October 20, 2025.

In a May 16 letter, plaintiffs proposed the following trial sequence: begin with Donnelly’s case, followed by those filed by Clinton Speers and Kevin Voelker.

All three plaintiffs were diagnosed with kidney cancer after consuming PFAS-contaminated water from the same source in Pennsylvania.

They argue these cases present a straightforward link between AFFF exposure and cancer, as the individuals share limited risk factors—Donnelly, for example, had only mild obesity and no other major health concerns.

This proposal aligns with the court’s directive to avoid complex medical backgrounds that could complicate causation assessments.

Plaintiffs also asked the court to consider trying the three cases together if broader consolidation with testicular cancer claims is denied.

Defendants oppose consolidation and suggest trying Voelker’s case first instead.

Judge Richard Gergel has yet to rule on how the initial trials will be structured.

May 20th, 2025: Connecticut Firefighters Advocate for PFAS-Free Gear Amid Rising Cancer Concerns

With cancer remaining the leading cause of death among firefighters, Connecticut lawmakers are pushing forward with legislation aimed at reducing PFAS exposure through updated gear and support programs.

House Bill 7120 proposes $3 million to help fire departments replace PFAS-laden turnout gear and fund cancer screening and treatment for firefighters.

PFAS, often called “forever chemicals,” are used in firefighting foam and gear and have been strongly associated with cancer and other health risks.

Studies by the International Association of Fire Fighters reveal that all three layers of standard firefighter gear contain PFAS, leading to repeated chemical exposure.

Although Connecticut banned PFAS-based foam in 2021, many departments struggle to afford PFAS-free gear, which costs around $4,000 per set and may carry performance concerns such as increased heat stress.

HB 7120 would provide reimbursements, fund safer gear, and launch health monitoring programs to address these gaps.

The bill complements SB 292, which will ban the sale of PFAS-containing products across the state by 2028.

These legislative moves reflect mounting public health concerns echoed in the AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits, where plaintiffs link long-term PFAS exposure to cancer.

May 13, 2025: AFFF MDL Bellwether Trial to Focus on Kidney Cancer Claims

In a major update to the AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit, the federal judge overseeing the MDL has ruled that the first bellwether trial will focus exclusively on kidney cancer claims.

This streamlining effort removes testicular cancer allegations to reduce complexity and help jurors better evaluate the evidence.

The trial is scheduled for October 20, 2025, and may involve up to three plaintiffs.

While plaintiffs initially proposed consolidating five cases covering both kidney and testicular cancer, the court favored the defense’s approach of limiting the first trial to kidney cancer only.

Plaintiffs must now rank their top three preferred cases in the event the court proceeds with only one.

The AFFF MDL currently includes close to 10,000 personal injury lawsuits, many tied to PFAS contamination in communities near military sites.

Horsham and Warminster, Pennsylvania, are among the first trial locations, reflecting the significant exposure tied to local military installations.

Defendants include major chemical companies like 3M, DuPont, BASF/Ciba, and Arkema.

These personal injury cases differ from previous water contamination claims, requiring detailed scientific analysis and individualized medical proof.

A Science Day is set for June 20, 2025, allowing both sides to present scientific evidence on PFAS-related cancers.

The court will revisit whether to consolidate bellwether cases after it rules on Daubert challenges and summary judgment motions this summer.

May 3rd, 2025: Filing Surge Suggests Settlement Talks Heating Up

The AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit has seen a significant increase in activity, with over 400 new cases added to the MDL within the last month.

This ongoing litigation has become the most active mass tort in the nation over the past year.

Lawsuits are being filed at a rapid pace, with many transferred from state courts and others entering the MDL directly.

This wave of filings suggests that plaintiffs’ attorneys may be organizing toward a potential settlement, as discovery deepens and pretrial processes advance.

While an official AFFF settlement has not yet been announced, the timing and volume of filings point to growing momentum.

Sources close to the litigation anticipate that a resolution may be reached by summer 2025.

Thousands of individuals, including veterans and firefighters exposed to toxic PFAS chemicals in AFFF, are seeking compensation for serious health effects, and the legal pressure to resolve these cases continues to build.

May 1st, 2025: May 2025 JPML Update

The AFFF Lawsuit is expanding quickly as more victims of PFAS exposure join the legal fight.

Firefighters, military personnel, and others exposed to AFFF firefighting foam are suing manufacturers, alleging that they failed to disclose the dangers of PFAS—chemicals tied to cancer and other serious illnesses.

Over the past month, 414 new cases were added to the AFFF multidistrict litigation (MDL), bringing the total increase for 2025 to 1,709 cases.

The lawsuits are being handled in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina.

The first bellwether trial is scheduled for October 6, 2025, and will address claims involving kidney and testicular cancer.

These early trials are critical in shaping future AFFF settlements and securing justice for those affected by the long-term impact of toxic chemical exposure.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and later developed cancer, contact an AFFF Lawyer from TruLawsuit Info for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation to see if you qualify for an AFFF Lawsuit.
April 19th, 2025: DOD Faces Challenges Phasing Out AFFF-Containing Firefighting Foam

Efforts to phase out the dangerous firefighting foam known as AFFF are gaining traction as the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) and individual states take action to address PFAS contamination.

AFFF contains per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which have been linked to serious health risks, including cancer, liver disease, thyroid disorders, and immune system harm.

Congress mandated the DOD to stop using AFFF by October 2024, but due to challenges with replacement technologies, the phase-out deadline has been extended to 2026 for certain uses.

While non-PFAS alternatives are available, they often require different handling procedures, such as water mixing before use, unlike the ready-to-deploy nature of AFFF.

The projected cost of eliminating AFFF use and upgrading systems exceeds $2.1 billion.

Meanwhile, state-led take-back programs have collected over 553,000 gallons of AFFF so far, with North Carolina alone spending $20 million to safely dispose of 120,000 gallons.

Some states have introduced financial incentives to encourage fire departments to adopt PFAS-free firefighting foams.

These combined efforts highlight the growing public health focus on reducing exposure to PFAS and addressing the long-term environmental damage caused by AFFF.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and later developed cancer, contact an AFFF Lawyer from TruLawsuit Info for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation to see if you qualify for an AFFF Lawsuit.

April 11th, 2025: Brunswick Landing Removes Nearly 1,000 Gallons of Toxic AFFF

Brunswick Landing has removed almost 1,000 gallons of toxic aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) from one of its airport hangars, marking an important step in Maine’s efforts to phase out PFAS-laden firefighting chemicals.

The Midcoast Regional Redevelopment Authority (MRRA) confirmed that Hangar 6, which previously housed 975 gallons of AFFF containing PFOS, has now been decommissioned and fitted with a fire suppression system that does not contain PFAS.

This removal follows a major spill in 2023 at nearby Hangar 4, where a malfunction released 1,450 gallons of AFFF mixed with 50,000 gallons of water.

The spill sparked statewide concern and led to heightened scrutiny of AFFF storage and disposal practices.

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is working with MRRA to explore safe disposal methods for the foam concentrate.

While environmental groups remain cautious, MRRA’s executive director described the cleanup as a “proactive approach” to addressing the PFAS issue.

These developments at Brunswick Landing come as lawsuits continue nationwide regarding AFFF exposure, with thousands of pending claims related to cancer and water contamination from the foam.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and later developed cancer, contact an AFFF Lawyer from TruLawsuit Info for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation to see if you qualify for an AFFF Lawsuit.

April 1st, 2025: April 2025 JPML Update

Between March and April 2025, the AFFF firefighting foam multidistrict litigation experienced a notable increase in case filings.

In March, there were 8,430 active cases, with 338 newly added to the MDL.

By April, the total grew to 8,928, marking a month-over-month increase of 498 new filings.

This steady rise underscores the growing number of individuals pursuing legal action after alleged exposure to toxic PFAS chemicals in AFFF products.

Many plaintiffs are military personnel or residents near military sites, where AFFF use was widespread.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and later developed cancer, contact an AFFF Lawyer from TruLawsuit Info for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation to see if you qualify for an AFFF Lawsuit.
March 3rd, 2025: AFFF MDL Grows by 338 Cases

The AFFF Lawsuit centers around claims that aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), used by military personnel and firefighters, contains PFAS “forever chemicals” linked to cancer and other serious health risks.

Plaintiffs assert that manufacturers did not warn users of these dangers, leading to widespread harm.

In February, 8,092 cases were pending in the AFFF MDL, and by March, that number increased to 8,430, with 338 new claims added.

This growth signifies an increase in awareness and legal action from those affected by PFAS exposure.

Most of the AFFF cases are being litigated in the U.S. District Court – Southern Carolina (MDL), with bellwether trials scheduled.

The first trial, focusing on kidney and testicular cancer claims, is set for October 6, 2025, with other cases following a different timeline.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and later developed cancer, contact an AFFF Lawyer from TruLawsuit Info for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation to see if you qualify for an AFFF Lawsuit.
February 17th, 2025: AFFF Litigation Expands to Address Liver and Thyroid Cancer Risks

The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing.

The federal court handling the AFFF firefighting foam litigation has broadened its investigation into health risks, now reviewing claims involving liver cancer and thyroid cancer.

The judge overseeing the AFFF MDL has directed attorneys to submit proposals by February 21 detailing the timeline for expert reports, depositions, and scientific challenges specific to these cancers.

To further assess the evidence, the court has scheduled a “Science Day” on June 6, 2025. Both plaintiffs and defendants will present educational insights on the connection between AFFF exposure and these newly considered health risks.

This session will play a crucial role in shaping the court’s understanding of the scientific foundation of these cases.

This expansion follows the first bellwether trials, which center on kidney cancer, testicular cancer, thyroid disease, and ulcerative colitis.

While the results of these early trials will not set legal precedent, they are expected to influence future settlements and compensation discussions in the ongoing AFFF litigation.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and later developed cancer, contact an AFFF Lawyer from TruLawsuit Info for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation to see if you qualify for an AFFF Lawsuit.
February 3rd, 2025: AFFF lawsuit grows by 459 cases

The AFFF Firefighting Foam lawsuit involves accusations that aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), used by firefighters and military personnel, contains harmful PFAS “forever chemicals” linked to cancer and other major health problems.

Plaintiffs claim that manufacturers failed to adequately warn users about the risks, leading to severe harm.

As of the start of the year, 7,633 cases were pending in the AFFF MDL, and by February, this number had risen to 8,092, with 459 new claims added.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and later developed cancer, contact an AFFF Lawyer from TruLawsuit Info for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation to see if you qualify for an AFFF Lawsuit.
January 12, 2025

A new study from the University at Buffalo uncovers alarming discoveries about PFAS, the “forever chemicals” present in AFFF firefighting foam.

Researchers revealed that PFAS can cross the blood-brain barrier, build up in brain tissue, and disrupt genes vital to brain health.

The study identified 11 genes consistently affected by PFAS, including one that protects neuronal cells but becomes suppressed, and another linked to cell death that becomes overactive.

These disruptions, along with PFAS’s ability to alter hundreds of other genes depending on their chemical structure, highlight the complexity of their neurotoxic effects.

This new evidence could support claims from individuals alleging health damages from PFAS contamination in water supplies near military bases and airports, particularly in ongoing litigation.

As the research continues, the findings may shape future regulations and legal responsibilities.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and later developed cancer, contact an AFFF Lawyer from TruLawsuit Info for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation to see if you qualify for an AFFF Lawsuit.

January 6, 2025

The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing.

The AFFF Lawsuit continues to gain traction as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) adds nine additional PFAS compounds to the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI).

These “forever chemicals” have long been linked to severe environmental contamination and health risks, especially in connection with aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) used by firefighters.

The nine newly listed PFAS chemicals include:
- Ammonium perfluorodecanoate (PFDA NH4)
- Sodium perfluorodecanoate (PFDA-Na)
- Perfluoro-3-methoxypropanoic acid
- 6:2 Fluorotelomer sulfonate acid
- 6:2 Fluorotelomer sulfonate anion
- 6:2 Fluorotelomer sulfonate potassium salt
- 6:2 Fluorotelomer sulfonate ammonium salt
- 6:2 Fluorotelomer sulfonate sodium salt
- Acetic acid, [(γ-ω-perfluoro-C8-10-alkyl)thio] derivs., Bu esters
Facilities exceeding specific usage thresholds for these PFAS are now required to report their use annually, beginning with data due to the EPA by July 2026.

These reporting requirements aim to provide critical insights into potential exposure sources, aiding community awareness and environmental remediation efforts.

This move reflects increasing recognition of AFFF’s role in groundwater and drinking water contamination, intensifying calls for safer alternatives and regulatory accountability.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and later developed cancer, contact an AFFF Lawyer from TruLawsuit Info for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation to see if you qualify for an AFFF Lawsuit.
Firefighting foam containing PFAS, or “forever chemicals,” poses significant risks due to its environmental persistence and links to cancer.

Despite decades of use, mounting evidence highlights its harmful impacts.

The AFFF multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the US District Court for the District of South Carolina reported 7,633 cases in January 2025, up from 7,370 in December 2024, with 263 new claims filed.

Key updates:
- Environmental Contamination: AFFF use has polluted groundwater and drinking water, leading to costly remediation efforts in states like Maine.
- Firefighter Health Risks: AFFF exposure is linked to elevated cancer risks, with occupational cancer causing 72% of firefighter line-of-duty deaths.
- Transition Challenges: Switching to fluorine-free foams requires costly decontamination, disposal, and safety testing.
- State Actions: Maine considers laws for AFFF inventories and takeback programs, while Colorado funds municipal transitions.
- Legal Developments: Maine joined lawsuits against manufacturers like 3M and DuPont, with MDL settlements potentially funding cleanup efforts.
Increased awareness of AFFF hazards drives calls for stricter regulations, expanded remediation funding, and safer alternatives.

Transitioning away from PFAS foams remains urgent.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and later developed cancer, contact an AFFF Lawyer from TruLawsuit Info for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation to see if you qualify for an AFFF Lawsuit.
The AFFF Firefighting Foam lawsuit alleges that aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) contains PFAS “forever chemicals” linked to cancer and other significant health problems.

Plaintiffs argue that manufacturers failed to provide adequate warnings about these risks, leading to widespread harm.

Case filings increased from 7,150 in November to 7,370 in December, adding 220 new claims.

Most AFFF cases are consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of South Carolina (MDL).

Bellwether trials are scheduled to begin on October 6, 2025, starting with a case related to kidney or testicular cancer.

Dates for trials involving other injuries have not yet been determined.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and later developed cancer, contact an AFFF Lawyer from TruLawsuit Info for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation to see if you qualify for an AFFF Lawsuit.
November 21, 2024

The AFFF lawsuit addresses contamination from aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) containing toxic PFAS chemicals.

The Department of Defense (DoD) has identified over 1,500 facilities using AFFF, with 700 confirmed as significant contamination sites.

Health Risks and Legislative Efforts

PFAS, known as “forever chemicals,” are linked to cancer, reproductive issues, and immune disorders. Military facilities contribute heavily to contamination, polluting local water supplies.

Lawmakers are pushing to include Section 319 of the DoD PFAS Discharge Prevention Act in the FY25 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), requiring regular PFAS monitoring and tailored runoff management practices.

Current Challenges

Delays in phasing out AFFF persist, with a Government Accountability Office (GAO) report urging faster transitions and contamination solutions.

Research shows high levels of branched perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), a carcinogen, in AFFF, posing long-term environmental risks.

Outlook

Adding Section 319 to the FY25 NDAA could reduce PFAS exposure, safeguard public health, and lower cleanup costs, addressing the ongoing impacts of AFFF contamination on military communities.

November 4, 2024

The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing.

The AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit is ongoing, with Indiana’s program for the collection and disposal of PFAS-based foam concluding on December 30.

Managed by the Indiana Department of Homeland Security (IDHS) in collaboration with the Department of Environmental Management, this initiative was launched to reduce firefighters’ exposure to PFAS.

These “forever chemicals” are associated with immune disorders, developmental challenges in children, and cancer, which remains the top cause of death among firefighters.

PFAS-based firefighting foams are essential for combating Class B fires involving highly flammable liquids like gasoline.

However, they can persist in the environment, contaminating nearby water sources, including military sites like Grissom Air Reserve Base.

IDHS has encouraged fire departments across Indiana to register for the program by December 1, noting that after its closure, financial constraints may limit future disposal efforts.

This state program reflects the broader national challenge, as PFAS chemicals remain prevalent in various consumer products, despite the EPA’s recent efforts to regulate specific compounds.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and later developed cancer, contact an AFFF Lawyer from TruLawsuit Info for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation to see if you qualify for an AFFF Lawsuit.
The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing.

This lawsuit addresses claims that aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), used extensively by firefighters and military personnel, contains PFAS “forever chemicals” known to be linked to cancer and other serious health issues.

Plaintiffs allege that manufacturers did not provide adequate warnings about these risks, leading to considerable health impacts.

The number of cases in this MDL peaked at 9,896 in October but decreased to 7,150 by November, reflecting a drop of 2,746 cases.

This reduction is attributed to case consolidations or dismissals involving injuries that did not qualify for the bellwether trial list.

A significant portion of AFFF litigation is taking place in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of South Carolina (Charleston Division).

The court has identified initial bellwether cases and issued a comprehensive scheduling order, setting deadlines for key activities such as depositions, expert testimony, motions, and pretrial preparations.

The first trial, involving a plaintiff with kidney or testicular cancer, is set for October 6, 2025.

Other plaintiffs with varying injuries are following a separate timeline, with trial dates pending.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and later developed cancer, contact an AFFF Lawyer from TruLawsuit Info for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation to see if you qualify for an AFFF Lawsuit.
October 23, 2024

Carrier Global Corp has agreed to settle three lawsuits for a total of $615 million, addressing claims related to Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF).

These settlements are part of the ongoing multidistrict litigation (MDL) in South Carolina, where plaintiffs have been impacted by contamination and health risks associated with firefighting foam.

The agreement includes resolving claims against Kidde-Fenwal (KFI), Carrier’s former subsidiary, which produced AFFF and is now in bankruptcy.

KFI has been at the center of lawsuits involving health issues such as cancer and water contamination caused by chemicals in AFFF, including per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which have been linked to kidney, bladder, and testicular cancer.

The $615 million settlement is part of a broader effort by companies like 3M and DuPont, which are also named in AFFF lawsuits, to address legal and financial challenges from other contamination claims.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and later developed cancer, contact an AFFF Lawyer from TruLawsuit Info for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation to see if you qualify for an AFFF Lawsuit.

October 1, 2024

The AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit concerns the harmful effects of direct exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), found in military-grade firefighting foam.

These “forever chemicals” are linked to several serious health conditions due to their persistence in the environment and the human body.

As of September 1st, the number of cases filed in the AFFF MDL stood at 9,576.

By October, that number increased to 9,896 AFFF Lawsuits pending, representing an increase of 320 new filings.

This rise reflects growing awareness of the dangers posed by PFAS exposure from AFFF, especially as more studies emerge linking the chemicals to various cancers and other debilitating illnesses.

The Department of Veterans Affairs is conducting an in-depth investigation to determine if kidney cancer can be linked to exposure to PFAS chemicals, which are found in firefighting foam and other products.

The outcome could designate kidney cancer as a presumptive service-connected condition, accelerating veterans’ access to health care and benefits.

This study follows growing concerns about the connection between PFAS exposure and various forms of cancer.

Veterans who were exposed to these chemicals during military service may be eligible for expedited claims if a connection is established.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer, contact an AFFF Lawyer from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation legal consultation today and find out if you qualify for a firefighting foam lawsuit.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you’re eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit instantly.
The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing.

Recent updates in the Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) litigation include a lawsuit filed by a group of firefighters against several major chemical companies, including 3M.

The lawsuit claims long-term exposure to toxic PFAS chemicals in AFFF has caused serious health problems.

The 12 plaintiffs allege that their exposure to AFFF has resulted in conditions such as prostate cancer, leukemia, and kidney cancer.

Despite decades of research on the dangers of PFAS, the companies are accused of failing to provide warnings or adopt safety precautions, continuing to distribute the foam without consent.

The plaintiffs are seeking medical monitoring, injunctive relief, and accountability for the harm caused by PFAS exposure.

In Brunswick, Maine, the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is conducting ongoing soil and water testing after a significant AFFF spill in August 2024.

PFAS contamination has been detected in local watersheds and marine environments, with some soil samples showing elevated levels of PFAS.

Although public water supplies have not been directly impacted and drinking water is safe, the DEP has advised the public to avoid recreational activities in the contaminated areas.

Further testing is ongoing, and additional updates are expected as the cleanup progresses.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and developed cancer, contact an attorney from TruLawsuit Info for a free, no-obligation consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly.
The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing

The AFFF (Aqueous Film Forming Foam) firefighting lawsuits continue to be a significant legal and environmental matter, largely due to the presence of PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), also known as “forever chemicals.”

These chemicals, commonly found in firefighting foam, are linked to serious health risks, including cancer, and have been contaminating water supplies across various regions.

Minnesota’s Regulatory Actions: In a first for the state, Minnesota is requiring 3M to limit PFAS discharge into the Mississippi River from its Cottage Grove plant.

This action follows concerns about the contamination of fish and water sources.

The plant, which has a long history of PFAS-related pollution issues, has contributed to drinking water contamination in the area.

Despite plans to end PFAS production by 2025 and build a $300 million water treatment system, 3M is challenging the permit requirements as legally unjustified.

Contamination in Grand Prairie, Texas: A firefighting foam spill in Grand Prairie led to potential contamination that impacted around 60,000 residents.

While the foam used was not believed to contain PFAS, residents were still advised not to use tap water due to a backflow issue.

Business and school were forced to temporarily close.

Cape Fear River Study: A study conducted by Cape Fear River Watch found that fish from the Northeast Cape Fear River had PFOS levels 20 times higher than state standards.

PFOS, part of the PFAS chemical family, is associated with cancer and development defects.

Lear’s Textile Company, which uses PFAS in its manufacturing process, is working with regulators to phase out the chemicals.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer, contact an attorney from TruLawsuit Info for a free, no-obligation consultation today.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly.
The AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit involves claims against the manufacturers of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), a firefighting agent used by first responders.

Recently, an accidental spill of over 1,400 gallons of firefighting foam containing toxic PFAS, also known as forever chemicals, occurred at an airplane hangar in Maine.

The incident happened when an outdated fire suppression system at Hangar 4, at the Brunswick Executive Airport, discharged unexpectedly, releasing foam into the hangar and nearby areas.

PFAS chemicals, found in the foam, are associated with significant health concerns.

The lawsuit seeks compensation for those impacted by exposure to these harmful chemicals.

In August, the federal AFFF MDL had 9,525 filings, which grew to 9,576 by September 1st.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer, contact an attorney from TruLawsuit Info for a free, no-obligation legal consultation today and find out if you qualify for a firefighting foam lawsuit.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly.
The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing.

Over 1,600 gallons of firefighting foam containing harmful PFAS chemicals were accidentally discharged at the former Brunswick Naval Air Base, now operating as Brunswick Executive Airport, due to a fire suppression system malfunction.

The foam, designed to extinguish jet fuel fires, entered the sewer and stormwater systems, leading to significant environmental contamination.

Nearby nature preserves were affected, with foam reaching depths of four to eight feet in some ponds, according to Steve Walker from the Brunswick-Topsham Land Trust.

Cleanup efforts by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection are ongoing, but concerns persist about the long-term environmental impact, as these chemicals are known for their persistence in nature and links to serious health risks.

PFAS chemicals in AFFF are at the center of ongoing lawsuits, where plaintiffs seek compensation for health and environmental damages caused by these toxic substances.

The Brunswick spill could potentially contribute to the growing litigation surrounding PFAS contamination and its harmful effects on the environment and the people within it.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer, contact an attorney from TruLawsuit Info for a free, no-obligation legal consultation today and find out if you qualify for a firefighting foam lawsuit.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly.
The AFFF lawsuit is ongoing

Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey has signed a law that mandates the phase-out of PFAS chemicals in firefighters’ protective gear, a significant move in the ongoing litigation surrounding Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF) and the toxic effects of PFAS.

The law, effective from January 2025, requires manufacturers and sellers to disclose the presence of PFAS in firefighting equipment and provide justifications for its inclusion.

By 2027, the sale of protective gear containing intentionally-added PFAS will be prohibited.

PFAS, or perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, have been linked to serious health conditions, including various cancers.

Firefighters, who are at a higher risk of developing cancer compared to the general population, have been particularly affected due to prolonged exposure to these chemicals in their gear and the use of AFFF in firefighting operations.

This legislation is expected to influence ongoing AFFF lawsuits, which allege that PFAS exposure from firefighting foam and gear has led to significant health problems.

With Massachusetts enacting one of the nation’s strictest PFAS regulations, this law could set a precedent for similar measures in other states, potentially affecting the outcomes of AFFF-related litigation.

Firefighter unions and advocacy groups, such as the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF), have long advocated against the use of PFAS in firefighting equipment due to its link to occupational cancers.

The new law is a response to these concerns and signifies a growing acknowledgment of the dangers.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer, contact an attorney from TruLawsuit Info for a free, no-obligation legal consultation today to find out if you qualify for the AFFF Lawsuit.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify to file an AFFF Lawsuit instantly.
The AFFF lawsuit is ongoing.

States nationwide are stepping up efforts to address the dangers of PFAS chemicals in firefighting gear and foams.

PFAS, synthetic chemicals resistant to environmental breakdown, are linked to serious health risks, including liver and kidney damage, reproductive harm, and certain cancers.

The Massachusetts State Senate has passed a bill banning PFAS in firefighter personal protective equipment (PPE), set to take effect on January 1, 2027.

This legislation aims to eliminate PFAS from the gear worn by firefighters, responding to growing concerns about the health risks of prolonged exposure to these chemicals.

Firefighter unions are urging the state’s House of Representatives to speed up the bill’s passage and send it to Governor Healey before the legislative session concludes.

In Alaska, a new law mandates that fire departments cease using PFAS-containing firefighting foams by January 1, 2025.

The law, which went into effect without the governor’s signature, requires a transition to PFAS-free alternatives and establishes a disposal system for existing PFAS foams in rural villages, with financial reimbursement from the state.

This legislation represents years of advocacy by environmental and health organizations and marks a significant step in tackling PFAS contamination, particularly in areas near airports and military bases where these foams have been widely used.

In Connecticut, two more fire departments, Stamford and Old Mystic, have joined a federal lawsuit against 3M and DuPont.

The lawsuit alleges that the companies’ turnout gear used by firefighters contains PFAS chemicals that pose cancer risks.

This legal action, which includes several other Connecticut departments and firefighter unions, may be the first of its kind in the nation, highlighting the increasing legal challenges faced by manufacturers of PFAS-containing products.

Regarding the AFFF Firefighting Foam MDL, more than 300 cases have been added in the past month.

As of August 1, the JPML reported 9,525 pending AFFF lawsuits.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer, contact an attorney from TruLawsuit Info for a free, no-obligation legal consultation today and find out if you qualify for a firefighting foam lawsuit.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly.
The AFFF lawsuit is ongoing.

The Senate Appropriations Committee has approved a transportation spending bill allocating $70 million to help airports transition to PFAS-free firefighting foams.

This funding is significantly higher than the House’s proposed $5 million.

Congress must reconcile the differences between the two versions of the T-HUD Fiscal Year 2025 Appropriations Bill.

PFAS, known as “forever chemicals,” persist in the environment and human body and are linked to cancer, reproductive harm, and immune system damage.

Aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) used in firefighting contains PFAS and can contaminate water supplies near airports.

Earlier this year, the Federal Aviation Administration reauthorization law established a five-year, $350 million grant program to aid airports in transitioning away from PFAS-containing foams.

The Senate T-HUD bill fully funds the program’s first year at $70 million and allocates $4.52 billion for airport infrastructure and safety improvements, and emissions reductions.

PFAS-free firefighting foams have been available since 2019, with over 100 fluorine-free options from 24 manufacturers meeting international aviation standards.

These alternatives are safe, effective, and ready for adoption by the military and U.S. airports.

Decades of using PFAS-laden foams have contaminated drinking and groundwater near airports.

The transition to PFAS-free foams is crucial for mitigating further environmental and health risks.

If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer, contact an attorney from TruLawsuit Info for a free, no-obligation legal consultation today and find out if you qualify for a firefighting foam lawsuit.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly.
The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing.

The federal judge overseeing the Firefighting Foam MDL has selected nine cases involving Pennsylvania residents with kidney or testicular cancer and Colorado residents with thyroid cancer or ulcerative colitis to go to trial.

Other key developments in the AFFF Lawsuit include:
- The Plaintiffs’ strategy reduced the number of required depositions and expert reports.
- Lawyers are pushing for more trial dates to expedite settlements.
- The Air Force is transitioning to a fluorine-free formulation (F3) in response to the AFFF Lawsuit.
- The Department of Defense is said to be “behind” on its goal to phase out AFFF.
If you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer, contact TruLawsuit Info for a free, no-obligation consultation today and find out if you qualify for the AFFF Lawsuit.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify to file an AFFF Lawsuit instantly.
The AFFF Lawsuit is ongoing.

On June 25, 2024, a mechanical malfunction at the Alaska Army National Guard Aviation Facility in Bethel resulted in the release of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) containing PFAS chemicals.

Approximately ten gallons of AFFF were discharged due to a fire suppression system failure, impacting the facility’s boiler room, hangar bay floor, and a small area outside.

The Alaska National Guard environmental team is hiring a PFAS-trained contractor for sample testing and ongoing site monitoring.

The Seneca Army Depot, now a Superfund site, has known PFAS contamination in its groundwater from historical AFFF use.

Despite the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) request for PFAS testing in nearby creeks, the Army has not planned immediate testing, opting to sample off-base receptors only if PFAS migration is observed.

Following consultations with the Army, the EPA removed the testing request from its website but continues discussions on PFAS remediation with the Army Corps of Engineers.

Seneca County has filed a lawsuit against the federal government, alleging PFAS contamination from the depot has damaged its drinking water supply.

The lawsuit claims that decades of AFFF use at the depot have contaminated the water supply with PFAS compounds.

The Waterloo water plant’s 2023 report shows PFOA levels at 4.24 ppt, disputing the higher contamination levels cited in the lawsuit.

The plant is upgrading its filtering systems to address PFAS contamination, with costs expected to exceed $12 million.

Our law firm is actively accepting clients for the AFFF Lawsuit, particularly targeting military personnel, firefighters, and airport workers exposed to AFFF.

Call today for a free consultation of you or someone you know has developed cancer or other health issues after being exposed to AFFF.

Furthermore, use the chatbot on this page for immediate qualification assessment in the AFFF lawsuit.
The AFFF lawsuit is ongoing.

The Department of Defense (DOD) is working diligently to eliminate the use of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) at its installations due to the health risks associated with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) found in AFFF.

PFAS exposure is linked to numerous health issues, including impacts on fetal development, immune system dysfunction, thyroid problems, liver damage, and cancer.

According to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020, the DOD must cease using AFFF by October 1, 2024, with possible waivers extending to October 1, 2026, except for shipboard use.

The DOD has formulated plans and schedules to replace AFFF in all land-based mobile assets and facilities globally.

This plan includes developing specifications for a fluorine-free foam alternative that meets fire extinguishing performance standards.

However, the transition faces several challenges, such as compatibility issues with current firefighting systems, substantial funding requirements estimated at over $2.1 billion, and the need for extensive training for DOD firefighters in using fluorine-free foams.

Despite these challenges, the DOD is committed to phasing out AFFF and adopting safer alternatives.

Our law firm is actively accepting clients for the AFFF Lawsuit, particularly targeting military personnel, firefighters, and airport workers exposed to AFFF.

Call today for a free consultation of you or someone you know has developed cancer or other health issues after being exposed to AFFF.

Furthermore, use the chatbot on this page for immediate qualification assessment in the AFFF lawsuit.
The AFFF lawsuit is ongoing.

The AFFF lawsuit addresses claims related to aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) used in firefighting, which contains harmful chemicals called per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).

These chemicals are linked to severe health issues, including cancer.

In June, there were 8,270 AFFF lawsuit filings.

By July, this number increased to 9,198.

PFAS in AFFF persists in the environment and human body, causing long-term health problems such as cancer, liver damage, and immune system issues.

Firefighters and exposed communities are at significant risk, leading to more individuals joining the AFFF lawsuit.

Our law firm is actively accepting clients for the AFFF Lawsuit, particularly targeting military personnel, firefighters, and airport workers exposed to AFFF.

Call today for a free consultation of you or someone you know has developed cancer or other health issues after being exposed to AFFF.

Furthermore, use the chatbot on this page for immediate qualification assessment in the AFFF lawsuit.
June 26, 2024

The Firefighting Foam Lawsuit is ongoing.

Connecticut firefighters, represented by the Uniformed Professional Fire Fighters Association of Connecticut, filed a class action lawsuit against DuPont, 3M, Honeywell, and 16 other defendants.

The lawsuit claims that the protective gear used by firefighters was contaminated with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), also known as “forever chemicals,” which are linked to cancer.

The lawsuit, filed in the New Haven federal court, targets firefighter gear containing PFAS.

Plaintiffs, including five other unions and five individual firefighters, allege that PFAS in jackets, pants, and other turnout gear were absorbed through the skin, ingestion, and inhalation.

This absorption rate increases with rising temperatures and sweat buildup, leading to an increased risk of adverse health conditions.

The lawsuit demands at least $5 million in damages for violations of Connecticut product liability law.

DuPont and 3M produced the PFAS used in the gear, while a Honeywell subsidiary sold the gear without warning firefighters of the risks.

DuPont stated the lawsuit is without merit, while 3M indicated its intention to defend itself or settle as appropriate.

Honeywell did not respond to requests for comment.

PFAS, used in many products, are dubbed “forever chemicals” because they do not break down easily in the human body or the environment and have been linked to various health issues.

Our law firm is actively accepting clients for the AFFF Lawsuit, particularly targeting military personnel, firefighters, and airport workers exposed to AFFF.

Call today for a free consultation of you or someone you know has developed cancer or other health issues after being exposed to AFFF.

Furthermore, use the chatbot on this page for immediate qualification assessment in the AFFF lawsuit

June 11, 2024

The AFFF lawsuit is ongoing.

A federal judge in South Carolina has granted preliminary approval for a $750 million settlement involving Tyco Fire Products LP, a subsidiary of Johnson Controls International PLC.

This settlement pertains to claims from public water systems affected by PFAS contamination, allegedly caused by Tyco’s AFFF firefighting foam products.

These include claims from:
- Public water providers for testing and remediation,
- Health-related claims from individuals exposed to AFFF,
- Requests for medical monitoring
- Claims from property owners for contamination cleanup costs,
- Claims from states for natural resource damages.
This agreement forms part of a larger multidistrict litigation (MDL) that includes significant previous settlements, such as a $12.5 billion settlement with 3M Co. and a $1.2 billion settlement with DuPont, Chemours, and Corteva.

The settlement class includes public water systems that detected PFAS in their water as of mid-May.

The MDL currently comprises over 10,000 PFAS-related damage cases. Although this settlement addresses some of the litigation issues, it does not resolve all the claims within the broader AFFF litigation, leaving several categories of claims outstanding.

Our law firm is actively accepting clients for the AFFF Lawsuit, particularly targeting military personnel, firefighters, and airport workers exposed to AFFF.

Call today for a free consultation of you or someone you know has developed cancer or other health issues after being exposed to AFFF.

Furthermore, use the chatbot on this page for immediate qualification assessment in the AFFF lawsuit.

June 3, 2024

The AFFF lawsuit is ongoing.

The AFFF lawsuit continues to address the severe effects of PFAS chemicals present in firefighting foams, which the US military and airports have extensively used for years.

In the last month, the AFFF Multi-District Litigation (MDL) has seen the addition of 209 new cases, bringing the current total to 8,270 pending cases as of June 1st.

PFAS chemicals in AFFF are linked to grave health concerns, including cancer, liver damage, and disruptions to the immune system.

Often referred to as “forever chemicals,” these substances are known for their persistence in the human body and the environment.

The contamination of local water supplies with PFAS from AFFF usage remains a pressing concern across the nation, especially around US Military installations.

Technological breakthroughs, like Battelle’s “The Annihilator” which employs supercritical water oxidation technology, are proving effective in eliminating PFAS from contaminated wastewater and firefighting foams.

Progress in cleanup technologies is essential for the removal of PFAS from environments.

Our law firm is actively accepting clients for the AFFF Lawsuit, particularly targeting military personnel, firefighters, and airport workers exposed to AFFF.

Call today for a free consultation of you or someone you know has developed cancer or other health issues after being exposed to AFFF.

Furthermore, use the chatbot on this page for immediate qualification assessment in the AFFF lawsuit.
The AFFF lawsuit is ongoing.

A substantial omnibus bill valued at $105 billion has passed the U.S. Senate and is currently awaiting House approval.

Included in this bill is $350 million designated for a grant program to phase out toxic AFFF foams containing PFAS at airports, including those located in New York.

This legislative initiative, known as the AFFF PFAS Replacement Program for Airports, will facilitate the transition to non-toxic firefighting foams, provide funds for decontaminating equipment, and support training for airport personnel.

PFAS compounds, infamously dubbed “forever chemicals,” are persistent in the environment and are linked to a range of serious health issues, including cancer and thyroid disorders.

Areas like the Capital Region, especially Hoosick Falls, have experienced significant AFFF PFAS contamination, which has led to intensive state-level investigations and multiple settlements.

In 2023, the EPA announced that no detectable amount of PFAS is safe in drinking water, prompting urgent calls for setting stringent regulatory standards.

Additionally, the aviation bill includes measures to enhance consumer protections, such as improving refund policies for passengers affected by delayed flights.

In a closely related development, San Francisco is nearing a milestone by potentially becoming the first city to ban PFAS from firefighter gear, with the San Francisco Fire Department required to transition to PFAS-free equipment by June 30, 2026.

Our law firm is actively accepting clients for the AFFF Lawsuit, particularly targeting military personnel, firefighters, and airport workers exposed to AFFF.

Call today for a free consultation of you or someone you know has developed cancer or other health issues after being exposed to AFFF.

Furthermore, use the chatbot on this page for immediate qualification assessment in the AFFF lawsuit.
The AFFF lawsuit is ongoing, and governmental remediation efforts are in progress.

The AFFF lawsuit is addressing the severe environmental and health dangers linked to PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), notoriously known as “forever chemicals.”

The AFFF lawsuit targets 3M and other manufacturers for their failure to warn about the hazardous impacts of PFAS, which research associates with cancer and other serious health conditions.

Initiated in the 1970s by the Department of Defense, the use of PFAS-containing foams primarily served to extinguish oil and gas fires at military and airport facilities.

PFAS contamination affects over 5,000 communities in all 50 states, putting the health of 60 million Americans at risk.

Legal actions currently compel PFAS producers to cover the costs of extensive clean-up processes.

These processes include the installation of advanced water filtration systems to remove PFAS from the contaminated water supplies – a vital yet costly step to safeguard public health.

Recent advancements in firefighting technology have introduced PFAS-free foams, several of which are fluorine-free and effectively extinguish liquid fuel fires, though they require more foam under optimal conditions due to varying “foam quality.”

Our law firm is actively accepting clients for the AFFF Lawsuit, particularly targeting military personnel, firefighters, and airport workers exposed to AFFF.

Call today for a free consultation of you or someone you know has developed cancer or other health issues after being exposed to AFFF.

Furthermore, use the chatbot on this page for immediate qualification assessment in the AFFF lawsuit.
The AFFF lawsuit is ongoing.

Recent updates reveal over 300 new AFFF Lawsuits have joined the Multidistrict Litigation (MDL), bringing the total to 8,061 pending cases, as per the latest records from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML).

Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) is used in firefighting training and operations, especially in military and civilian airports.

Plaintiffs involved in the AFFF Lawsuit allege that exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) found in AFFF has caused significant health issues, including cancer.

The AFFF Lawsuit accuses manufacturers of knowing the health risks associated with AFF exposure yet failing to adequately warn users.

Firefighters, military staff, and airport employees are primarily impacted by these health risks.

If you or a loved one has been exposed to AFFF, call us today for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page for an instant AFFF case evaluation.
Tyco Fire Products has agreed to a $750 million settlement in a case related to the contamination of public water systems with PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), which are components of firefighting foams.

PFAS are known for their durability in the environment and for potentially causing serious health problems, including cancer.

This settlement is part of a series of legal agreements with companies such as 3M and Dupont, underscoring the ongoing efforts to mitigate the environmental and health risks associated with these chemicals.

The agreement is pending approval from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina and aims to support the enhancement of water treatment systems.

This specific settlement deals with public water systems impacted by PFAS from firefighting foams. Concurrently, the broader AFFF lawsuit, which includes claims for personal injuries and cancer, is still active and has not been resolved.

Our law firm is actively accepting new clients for the AFFF lawsuit.

Please contact us for a free consultation, or utilize the chatbot on this page to instantly determine if you qualify for the AFFF lawsuit.
The progression of AFFF litigation is notable.

The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) reported an increase to 7,738 pending lawsuits for consolidation as of April 1st, up from 7,170 as of March 1st.

This rise in litigation is largely due to increased awareness among individuals about their rights to seek compensation for exposure to Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF), a firefighting foam extensively used by various military branches and firefighting units for its capacity to extinguish fuel-based fires.

Concerns have emerged regarding the health implications of AFFF’s chemical ingredients, particularly Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), which are suspected of being linked to several severe health conditions.

Individuals with extended exposure to AFFF, especially firefighters and military personnel, are considered to be at greater risk and have been pivotal in highlighting these health concerns.

Individuals who have encountered AFFF and subsequently faced health issues are urged to seek legal advice to explore their compensation options.

Our law firm provides complimentary consultations to evaluate potential claims related to AFFF exposure.

For immediate assistance or to discuss your case with our specialized AFFF attorneys, please use the chatbot feature on our website or contact us directly.
The AFFF Lawsuit continues, and our team of AFFF Attorneys is actively enrolling clients from all 50 states.

Progress is being made in the AFFF (Aqueous Film-Forming Foam) legal battle by setting up a procedural structure designed to evaluate the scientific foundation of allegations that the foam’s chemicals are linked to liver and thyroid cancer.

An integral part of this procedure is the forthcoming “Science Day,” during which experts will present the MDL judge with crucial scientific and medical evidence that forms the basis of these claims.

This stage of the litigation involves the selection of particular liver and thyroid cancer cases for the bellwether process, which imitates trial conditions to gauge potential jury reactions to the evidence and testimonies presented.

Important deadlines have been established for the involved parties to share scientific research that either supports or disputes the claims of cancer, leading up to the presentations on Science Day.

After these presentations, a period of 60 days will be dedicated to formulating a comprehensive strategy for moving forward with the bellwether trials.

This follows the settlement of water contamination claims by the 3M Company with local water suppliers, amounting to more than $10.3 billion.

However, the cancer claims related to AFFF exposure are still unresolved and awaiting settlement.

Should you or someone you know have been exposed to AFFF and later developed cancer or other health issues, you might be eligible to participate in the AFFF Lawsuit.

Reach out to our law firm for a no-cost consultation, or use the ChatBot on our website to determine your eligibility for the AFFF lawsuit.
The ongoing AFFF lawsuit has seen a total of 7,170 lawsuits awaiting consolidation, as indicated in the latest Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) documents.

In the U.S., Multidistrict Litigations (MDLs) are established to efficiently oversee numerous civil lawsuits that present similar legal issues, involve common facts, or concern the same defendants.

Such litigations typically gather a large number of lawsuits under a unified cause—ranging from product liability to pharmaceutical disputes and mass torts—allowing them to be combined and processed in one federal district court for all pretrial activities.

The AFFF MDLs are designed to simplify the legal process, centralizing discovery to avoid redundant efforts and guarantee uniformity in crucial legal decisions.

The addition of 176 lawsuits in the last month underscores the growing momentum of the AFFF MDL efforts.

Despite reaching a settlement regarding cases of water contamination, the battle over individual exposures to Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF) presses on.

It’s imperative for those affected by AFFF to understand their legal options.

Utilize the chatbot feature on this site to promptly ascertain your eligibility for the AFFF lawsuit.

What is the AFFF lawsuit?

Fire extinguishers are necessary for any public building as they are a key safety measure in the event of a fire.

However, many AFFF foam fire extinguishers have now been found to contain toxic substances which have impacted the health of many.

These toxic substances are known as Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).

A rise in health complications related to PFAS due to AFFF exposure has led to various lawsuits in order to get justice for the victims and their families.

AFFF firefighting foam isn’t limited to the fire department, as it is also used in many types of training.

For example, the U.S. military has used this foam for many years, and it is also used in crash test training simulations.

This means that many people could have a claim in the AFFF lawsuit due to coming in contact with this toxic firefighting foam.

Is the AFFF lawsuit a class action lawsuit?

No, the AFFF lawsuit is not a class action lawsuit.

An AFFF Class action lawsuit status would require all plaintiffs to be similarly situated, which is not the case here.

Instead, the AFFF firefighting foam lawsuit is an MDL (Multidistrict Litigation).

In an MDL, the cases are not combined into one single lawsuit, but rather the discovery and other pretrial proceedings are coordinated by a single judge.

This helps to avoid duplicative work and conflicting rulings on pretrial matters.

How many cases are in the AFFF MDL?

As of September 2022, there are over 2,500 pending cases in the MDL AFFF lawsuit.

The docket is consolidated and includes claims that allege exposure to or pollution from PFAS-containing aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF).

Judge Richard Gergel of the United States District Court of South Carolina currently presides over the litigation.

In 2021, it was announced that three cases would go to trial in 2023 from the thousands of cases waiting to be resolved.

These bellwether cases all involve allegations that AFFF firefighting foam polluted drinking water sources statewide and led to health problems resulting from occupational exposure to firefighting foam.

Various AFFF manufacturers and suppliers might be held responsible for remediation costs.

Victims in the AFFF lawsuits are seeking compensation for their injuries, medical expenses, and other serious damages.

The lawsuits also seek to hold the manufacturers accountable for their actions and force them to change their practices with regard to aqueous film-forming foam.

What is AFFF?

AFFF (an acronym for aqueous film-forming foam) is a type of firefighting foam that is used to extinguish fires involving flammable liquids.

This type of foam was developed in the 1960s and has since become the most common type of suppression foam used by firefighters.

What’s more, AFFF firefighting foam was used for many years by the military and firefighters alike.

However, problems are arising based on mounting evidence that the chemicals in AFFF likely cause serious illnesses in exposed individuals, including cancer.

What is in Aqueous film forming foam?

Aqueous film-forming foam is a synthetic fluorine-based surfactant that is mixed with water to create a thick foam.

However, this firefighting foam contains chemicals including:

Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA): These are both fluorinated organic compounds that are used as surfactants. They are also persistent organic pollutants and toxic chemicals.
Fluorotelomers: Chemicals that are used to make fluoropolymers, which are then used in many products, including nonstick cookware, stain-resistant fabrics, and firefighting foam.

Some of the chemicals in aqueous film-forming foam are known as forever chemicals, meaning they do not break down in the environment and can accumulate in the bodies of humans and animals.

This means that the health effects of exposure to these dangerous chemicals may not be immediately apparent but could develop over time.

How does AFFF put out a fire?

AFFF firefighting foam works by creating a blanket of foam on the surface of the burning liquid, which smothers the fire and prevents it from spreading.

It does this by quickly cooling the burning liquid and creating a barrier between the oxygen in the air and the fuel.

AFFF firefighting foam is particularly effective at extinguishing fires involving flammable substances such as gasoline, oil, and alcohol. It is also effective at suppressing fires in Class A (combustible materials such as wood and paper) and Class B (flammable liquid) fires.

Is AFFF foam corrosive?

Yes, this firefighting foam is corrosive, so it has always been important to take measures to protect the skin and eyes when using it.

It is recommended to wear gloves, goggles, and a face shield when handling or using AFFF foam to avoid direct AFFF exposure.

AFFF is also used in aircraft fire extinguishment and can also ruin aircraft and their parts due to corrosion.

Even though AFFF has the same pH as water resources, they can be highly corrosive to sensitive equipment like circuit boards because the foam usually sticks around instead of flowing off.

What is PFAS?

PFAS chemicals are a group of manmade chemicals that includes perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), as mentioned earlier.

PFOA and PFOS have been the most extensively produced and studied of these chemicals.

PFAS chemicals are used in a variety of everyday products, such as:

Nonstick cookware
Water-resistant clothing
Stain-resistant fabrics and carpets
Firefighting foams

These chemicals are resistant to heat, water and oil, making them ideal for certain situations.

However, this resistance also means that PFAS do not decompose easily, and as a result, they can accumulate in the soil and water over time.

Further, there is evidence that exposure to PFAS can lead to adverse human health effects.

For example, humans are exposed to PFAS through these things:

Eating food contaminated with PFAS
Drinking water contaminated with PFAS
Using products that contain PFAS
Working in industries that use or produce PFAS
Living near sites where PFAS are manufactured or used

Does all fighting fire foam contain PFAS?

No, not every firefighting foam contains PFAS.

For example, firefighting foam used for Class A fires, which are fueled by organic materials like wood or paper, does not typically contain PFAS.

That being said, some Class A foams may still have trace amounts of PFAS because they are often manufactured using the same equipment as Class B foams.

What foam has PFAS?

AFFF firefighting foams used for Class B and C fires, which are fueled by flammable liquids like gasoline or oil, often contain PFAS.

Due to the dangerous effects they can have, some manufacturers have reformulated their products to remove or greatly reduce the PFAS content.

Frequently Asked Questions

AFFF firefighting foam lawyers are still speculating on the exact amount that each plaintiff may receive in their AFFF lawsuit settlements.

However, it’s safe to say that the AFFF firefighting foam settlement amounts will be very high.

This is because the injuries caused by these chemicals are very serious, including cancer and other illnesses.

By looking at previous MDLs, it’s possible to make some estimates on current AFFF firefighting foam lawsuit settlements.

Top-tier plaintiffs could receive around $200,000 and $500,000.

Second-tier plaintiffs could receive around $150,000 to $300,000, and third or lower tiers may receive $75,000 or less.

While AFFF has been necessary for firefighting purposes, especially in managing fuel fires, it seems the environmental and physical dangers outweigh the advantages.

The long-term health effects of exposure to these chemicals are now being taken into consideration, as well as the impact on the environment.

There is a movement to find more environmentally friendly ways to extinguish fires, and it seems that AFFF may soon be a thing of the past.

It’s hoped that these lawsuits will bring about a much-needed change in the way that AFFF is used and manufactured and that safer, more environmentally friendly products will be developed to take its place.

In the meantime, it’s important for those who have been exposed to AFFF to be aware of the potential health risks and to monitor their health closely.

Not sure if you can qualify for this lawsuit?

Find out in as little as 60 seconds using our chat below for a free case evaluation.

Learn more
Yes, if your loved one died as a result of exposure to AFFF, you may be able to file a wrongful death claim against the manufacturer.

These claims involve seeking compensation for the death of a loved one due to the negligence or recklessness of another party.

You can expect different forms of compensation, such as medical and funeral expenses, loss of earnings and benefits, pain and suffering before death occurs, and loss of companionship.

The deceased’s closest relatives typically have the first right to compensation in a wrongful death claim.

Most often, this is the spouse, followed by the children if there is no existing spouse.

If the deceased did not have a spouse or children, their parents might be able to get compensation through a wrongful death claim, particularly if the deceased contributed to their parents’ support—financially or physically.

Do I Qualify?
Yes, you can still file a claim and get involved in AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits even if you’re not a firefighter.

Although it’s true that firefighters may have had more direct AFFF exposure, many other people were also exposed to these harmful chemicals.

For example, AFFF was commonly used at military bases, airports, and factories.

Many claims in the firefighting foam lawsuit involve individuals who may have been exposed to AFFF through contaminated water etc., and subsequently developed cancer or other illnesses.

To make a valid claim in the AFFF foam lawsuit, plaintiffs will need proof that they developed one of the cancers linked to AFFF exposure, such as prostate cancer or kidney or testicular cancer, and that they were exposed to AFFF firefighting foam chemicals.

With an experienced attorney, you’ll need to collect occupation evidence of AFFF exposure, such as work history and work placements, etc.

Medical records of your cancer diagnosis, such as lab tests, imaging and medical bills, will also need to be collated.

The amount of compensation you’ll receive depends on a few factors, such as the extent of your AFFF foam exposure, your time of diagnosis and the severity of your illnesses.

If you think you were exposed to AFFF firefighting foam, you can use our chatbot for a free case evaluation.

Do I Qualify?
Many cases in the AFFF lawsuit claim that AFFF manufacturers were aware of the dangers AFFF and the toxic chemicals posed, but they neglected to share this information to make a profit.

If manufacturers fail to disclose known risks of their products, they may be held liable for injuries or damages suffered by users of those products, and this is the case with the AFFF firefighting foam lawsuit.

Learn more
The companies named in the AFFF lawsuits include:
- 3M
- Tyco Fire Products LP
- Chemguard Inc.
- Buckeye Fire Equipment Co.
- Chubb Fire.
- Kidde-Fenwal Inc.
- Dupont
- And more.
The AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits are seeking various forms of compensation for the damages that have been caused by aqueous film-forming foam, and the companies involved are in the process of defending themselves against these lawsuits.

Learn more
Yes, AFFF is still being used, but due to recent evidence resulting from the AFFF foam lawsuits, there has been a shift to reduce and eventually eliminate the use of AFFF firefighting foam.

The U.S. military has also been working to phase out the use of AFFF due to the health and environmental risks associated with the chemicals in the foam.

The AFFF firefighting foam lawsuit is still ongoing, and current regulations on AFFF usage vary from state to state.

However, certain guidelines outline ways for fire protection officials and government agencies to comply slightly more with environmental and groundwater experts’ suggestions.

Some of these guidelines state:
- AFFF can only be used in extreme circumstances, specifically in:
  - Alcohol-based products
  - Aviation incidents
  - Hydrocarbon fires
- In any other circumstance, an alternative that doesn’t include PFAS chemicals needs to be used, especially when it comes to fire safety and training.
These guidelines don’t completely stop the use of AFFF – however, they do lower exposure to large amounts of PFAS while still keeping people and buildings safe during a fire.

Learn more
There is no definitive answer to this question, as different jurisdictions have different regulations regarding the use of AFFF.

Some countries have banned the use of AFFF, while others have restricted its use.

Overall, the general consensus is that AFFF firefighting foam should only be used in cases where other fire suppression methods are not effective.

This widely used fire suppression foam has been confirmed by the U.S. Department of Defense to be a major source of environmental contamination from PFAS.

When AFFF is used to suppress a fire, the PFAS within the foam seeps into the environment and groundwater, contaminating anything in its path. So many states are reevaluating if they should allow AFFF, and some are taking measures to prohibit it.

The Department of Defense has even set a deadline of 2024 for military organizations using firefighting foam containing PFAS to switch products.

Learn more
There are various alternatives available, some with different or lower PFAS content than traditional AFFF foams.

There are also several non-AFFF firefighting foam options available that don’t contain any PFAS, which are typically more expensive, but they don’t pose the same risks to human health and the environment.

A few of these non-AFFF firefighting foam alternatives include:

C6 Firefighting foam concentrates

These products typically use a different fluorochemical called 6:2 Fluorotelomer alcohol, or C6 FTOH.

C6 FTOH is structurally similar to PFAS, but it’s not as persistent in the environment, and it doesn’t build up in the human body as PFAS does.

However, C6 FTOH can still contaminate drinking water if it’s not used properly.

Firefighting foams containing C8 (a fluorosurfactant with a carbon chain length of eight) have begun to face legislation and regulation because the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has discovered that longer fluorosurfactants’ chains – those above six carbons – contain PFAS.

However, Fluorosurfactants whose chains are shorter – at six or fewer carbons long- don’t pose the same risks.

Fluorine-free foams

Fluorine-free foam is a manmade alternative to traditional foams used for fire suppression.

It contains surfactant blends and polysaccharides, which create a cooling blanket of bubbles when applied to fire fuels that prevent the spread of flames.

Unlike other options, the fluorine-free foam does not contain PFAS.

This gives it a clear environmental advantage, as it is less likely to contaminate its surroundings.

Dry chemical agents

Dry chemical agents are another fire suppressant option, which uses a chemical powder to extinguish flames.

Pressurized dry chemical agents work by creating a barrier between the fuel and the oxygen in the air, starving the fire of its needed elements.

One advantage of dry chemical agents is that they can be used on different types of fires, including those involving combustible liquids and energized electrical equipment.

Another advantage is that they can be discharged through small orifices, making them effective in suppressing hard-to-reach fires.

Still, many dry chemical agents are considered hazardous, so they must be used with caution.

Learn more
AFFF is most effective on Class B and Class C fires, which involve flammable liquids or gases.

This firefighting foam is often used for fuel fires, which are common in industrial and automotive settings.

Fuel fires can be especially difficult to extinguish because the fuel often continues to feed the fire even after the initial flames have been extinguished.

AFFF firefighting foam can help to quickly stifle these types of fires and prevent them from reigniting.

Learn more
Both are foam-based extinguishers, but Film-forming Fluoroprotein (FFFP) foams are better suited for reigning in hydrocarbon liquid fires and are formed with protein foam technology.

FFFP foams can also be used unaspirated, which means they do not require a separate air supply.

The protein-based composition of the foam gives it a high resistance to heat, meaning it can quickly snuff out fires.

Additionally, the film formation properties help to rapidly knock down flames.

Film forming Fluoroprotein foams excel in high-risk situations where hydrocarbons (crude oil, aviation kerosene, gasoline, and diesel fuel) are stored or transported.

The rapid intervention vehicles at many airports and military bases use these products because they can quickly put out fires and provide postfire security with only a small amount of foam concentrate.

Learn more
The PFAS found in AFFF is carcinogenic, which is why there is a link between firefighting foam, cancer, and other physical health issues.

Human exposure to these chemicals puts individuals at an increased risk of developing cancer later on, as the PFAS don’t deteriorate or leave the body easily.

In fact, these fire suppression chemicals can bind with proteins in the blood and stay in the body for years.

Then, they can gradually build up in tissue over time until cancers form.

As mentioned earlier, these chemicals in firefighting foam do not decompose and may take thousands of years to eliminate from groundwater and soil, according to research.

What’s more, when firefighters are exposed to AFFF foam, they can end up with high levels of fluorinated compounds in their blood, which has been linked to kidney and testicular cancer, as well as thyroid disease.

Learn more
The PFAS in AFFF firefighting foam is associated with a range of cancers, including:
- Prostate Cancer
- Testicular Cancer
- Pancreatic Cancer
- Kidney Cancer
- Bladder Cancer
- Leukaemia
- Thyroid Cancer
Unfortunately, AFFF exposure doesn’t just cause cancer.

It can also lead to fertility issues, liver damage, birth defects, and immune suppression.

Do I Qualify?

Written By:

Jessie Paluch

Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO

With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.

In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.

In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!

Do You
Have A Case?

Here, at Tru Lawsuit Info, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.

To do this, we actively work to connect them with attorneys who are experts in litigating cases similar to theirs.

Would you like our help?

About Tru Lawsuit Info

Tru Lawsuit Info is a reliable source of information about issues that may affect your health and safety, such as faulty products, data breaches, and environmental hazards.

Our team of experienced writers collaborates with medical professionals, lawyers, and advocates to produce informative articles, guides, and other resources that raise awareness of these topics.

Our thorough research provides consumers with access to reliable information and updates on lawsuits happening around the country. We also can connect consumers with attorneys if they need assistance.

Camp Lejeune Lawsuit

Camp Lejeune's water contamination issue spanned several decades starting in the 1950s. Exposure to these chemicals has been linked to various serious health issues, including cancer, organ diseases, and death.

Learn More

Tylenol Lawsuit

Research is increasingly suggesting a link between the use of Tylenol during pregnancy and the development of neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism and ADHD, in infants.

Learn More

AFFF Lawsuit

Legal action is being taken against manufacturers of Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF), a chemical used in fighting fires. The plaintiffs allege that exposure to the foam caused health issues such as cancer, organ damage, and birth and fertility issues.

Learn More

AFFF Lawsuit: Firefighting Foam Cancer Lawsuit

Key Takeaways:

AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit Overview

Table of Contents

Lawsuit Updates

September 2, 2025 Update:

September 2, 2025: September 2025 JPML Update

August 1, 2025 Update:

July 1, 2025 Update:

June 2, 2025 Update:

May 1, 2025 Update:

April 11, 2025 Update:

March 3, 2025 Update:

February 17, 2025 Update:

February 3, 2025 Update:

January 12, 2025 Update:

January 2, 2025 Update:

December 2, 2024 Update:

November 21, 2024 Update:

November 1, 2024 Update:

October 23, 2024 Update:

September 19, 2024 Update:

September 5, 2024 Update:

September 1, 2024 Update:

August 21, 2024 Update:

August 15, 2024 Update:

August 1, 2024 Update:

July 26, 2024 Update:

July 23, 2024 Update:

July 12, 2024 Update:

July 9, 2024 Update:

July 1, 2024 Update:

June 11, 2024 Update:

May 15, 2024 Update:

May 6, 2024 Update:

May 1, 2024 Update:

April 15, 2024 Update:

April 1, 2024 Update:

March 21, 2024 Update:

March 6, 2024 Update:

What is the AFFF lawsuit?

Is the AFFF lawsuit a class action lawsuit?

How many cases are in the AFFF MDL?

What is AFFF?

What is in Aqueous film forming foam?

How does AFFF put out a fire?

Is AFFF foam corrosive?

What is PFAS?

Does all fighting fire foam contain PFAS?

What foam has PFAS?

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the average AFFF lawsuit settlement?

Can you file a wrongful death claim for a loved one who died as a result of exposure to AFFF?

Can you file a claim if you're not a firefighter?

Why are manufacturers being sued in the AFFF Lawsuit?

Which manufacturers are involved in the AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits?

Is AFFF still being used?

Is AFFF banned?

What are the alternatives to AFFF?

What type of fire is AFFF used on?

What is the difference between AFFF and FFFP?

Is AFFF a carcinogen?

What forms of cancer do the PFAS in AFFF firefighting foam cause?

Related Articles

Helpful Sites & Resources