Attorney Jessie Paluch, founder of TruLaw, has over 25 years of experience as a personal injury and mass tort attorney, and previously worked as an international tax attorney at Deloitte. Jessie collaborates with attorneys nationwide — enabling her to share reliable, up-to-date legal information with our readers.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and legal experts at TruLawsuit Info and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced injury lawyer, Jessie Paluch, you can do so here.
TruLawsuit Info does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact our team by using the chat on the bottom of this page. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
On this page, we’ll provide an overview of the PFAS thyroid disease lawsuit, links between PFAS exposure and thyroid disease, how to file a PFAS thyroid disease lawsuit, and much more.
Key aspects of the PFAS thyroid disease lawsuit include:
If you or a loved one has developed thyroid disease or any other severe health conditions after being exposed to PFAS chemicals at a military base, you may be eligible for compensation.
Contact TruLawsuit Info using the chat on this page to receive an instant case evaluation to see if you qualify to file a PFAS thyroid disease lawsuit.
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are synthetic chemicals used in various industrial and consumer products.
Military facilities have been significantly impacted by PFAS contamination due to the widespread use of firefighting foam.
This section outlines the sources and extent of PFAS contamination at military facilities and the health implications for military personnel.
PFAS contamination at military facilities primarily results from the use of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) in firefighting exercises and emergency responses.
These foams, containing high levels of PFAS, have led to persistent environmental contamination.
The extent of PFAS contamination includes:
These contamination sources present long-term environmental and health concerns for military personnel and their families.
Exposure to PFAS in military environments has been linked to various adverse health impacts.
Military personnel face significant health risks due to prolonged exposure to contaminated drinking water and soil.
Health risks associated with PFAS exposure include thyroid dysfunction, increased likelihood of various cancers, and immune system effects.
Continued research and monitoring are essential to fully understand and mitigate the health risks posed by PFAS contamination at military facilities.
The impact of PFAS exposure on military personnel and their families is significant, affecting their health and well-being in multiple ways.
This section explores the specific health effects of PFAS exposure on military members and the risks faced by their families living near contaminated water supplies.
Military members are particularly vulnerable to PFAS exposure due to the nature of their duties and prolonged presence on contaminated bases.
The health effects can be severe and long-lasting, impacting their overall quality of life and ability to serve.
Increased risks of cancer, including kidney cancer, endocrine disruption, and immune system impairment, are primary health concerns for military personnel.
These health effects not only affect their personal well-being but also their professional performance and readiness.
Families residing on or near contaminated military bases are also at risk of PFAS exposure through various environmental pathways.
This exposure can have significant health implications, particularly for vulnerable groups such as children and pregnant women.
Key health risks for families include:
Addressing these risks is crucial for protecting the health and well-being of military families.
The connection between PFAS exposure and thyroid disease has garnered significant scientific interest.
Numerous studies have investigated how these toxic chemicals interact with the human body, particularly focusing on their potential to induce thyroid diseases.
Several scientific studies have demonstrated a correlation between PFAS exposure and an increased risk of thyroid disease.
Research indicates that individuals with higher levels of PFAS in their blood are more likely to develop thyroid disorders.
Key findings from scientific studies include:
These studies provide compelling evidence for the potential of PFAS to contribute to the development of thyroid disease.
The mechanisms by which PFAS contributes to thyroid disease development are complex.
PFAS chemicals can interfere with thyroid hormone regulation and disrupt normal cellular functions, leading to thyroid diseases.
PFAS are known to bind to proteins and accumulate in the thyroid gland, where they can alter hormone production and signaling pathways.
This disruption can lead to the development of thyroid disease.
The legal basis for PFAS thyroid disease lawsuits is grounded in tort law principles, focusing on product liability, negligence, and environmental contamination.
Victims of PFAS exposure who develop thyroid disease can seek compensation for their injuries.
This section outlines the legal justifications for suing over PFAS exposure and reviews previous lawsuits and their outcomes.
Individuals affected by PFAS exposure can file lawsuits on several legal grounds, including product liability, negligence, and failure to warn.
The main legal justifications for suing over PFAS exposure include:
These legal justifications provide a foundation for affected individuals to seek justice and compensation for their injuries.
Numerous PFAS lawsuits have been filed in recent years, with various outcomes.
Some cases have led to significant financial settlements, while others have prompted regulatory changes and increased awareness of PFAS-related health risks.
Notable outcomes of previous PFAS lawsuits include large settlements with chemical manufacturers, compensation for affected individuals, and the establishment of medical monitoring programs.
These outcomes highlight the importance of holding responsible parties accountable and provide precedents for future litigation.
Filing a PFAS thyroid disease lawsuit involves several critical steps to ensure that the claim is properly documented and presented.
Affected individuals must gather substantial evidence and follow legal procedures to maximize their chances of a successful outcome.
This section details the steps to take when filing a PFAS thyroid disease lawsuit and the essential evidence and documentation required.
Filing a PFAS thyroid disease lawsuit requires careful planning and adherence to legal processes.
The initial steps involve consulting with a specialized attorney, gathering evidence, and filing the necessary legal documents.
The essential steps include:
Following these steps ensures that your case is well-prepared and has a solid foundation for legal action.
Successful PFAS thyroid disease lawsuits rely heavily on comprehensive evidence and documentation.
This evidence supports the claim that PFAS exposure causes thyroid disease and justifies the demand for compensation.
Important evidence includes medical records detailing the diagnosis and treatment of thyroid disease, proof of PFAS exposure (such as water testing results and military service records), and expert testimonies linking PFAS exposure to the disease.
Collecting thorough and detailed documentation strengthens the case and increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome.
PFAS thyroid disease lawsuits can be complex, often involving various legal and scientific challenges.
Plaintiffs must navigate these obstacles to build a compelling case against manufacturers and other responsible parties.
This section discusses the common challenges faced in PFAS thyroid disease lawsuits and the potential defenses used by PFAS manufacturers.
Filing a PFAS thyroid disease lawsuit involves overcoming several significant challenges.
These challenges can complicate the legal process and affect the outcome of the case.
Common challenges include:
Successfully addressing these challenges is crucial for plaintiffs seeking justice and compensation.
PFAS manufacturers often employ various defenses to counter lawsuits and minimize their liability.
Understanding these potential defenses can help plaintiffs and their attorneys prepare stronger cases.
Manufacturers may argue that the plaintiff’s thyroid disease was caused by factors other than PFAS exposure, such as genetic predisposition or other environmental exposures.
They might also challenge the validity of scientific studies linking PFAS to thyroid disease or claim that they complied with existing regulations and industry standards at the time of PFAS use.
Additionally, they may invoke statutes of limitations to argue that the lawsuit was filed too late.
Countering these defenses requires robust evidence and expert testimony to substantiate the claims of PFAS-induced thyroid disease.
The future of PFAS regulation and legal actions is likely to see significant developments as awareness of the health risks associated with these chemicals continues to grow.
Regulatory agencies and lawmakers increasingly focus on addressing PFAS contamination and holding manufacturers accountable.
This section explores current and proposed regulations on PFAS and future trends and legal developments in PFAS litigation.
Regulatory agencies have begun implementing and proposing measures to reduce PFAS contamination and protect public health.
These regulations are critical in managing the widespread impact of PFAS and ensuring safer environments.
Key regulations and proposals include:
These regulatory efforts are essential steps toward reducing PFAS exposure and preventing further contamination.
The landscape of PFAS litigation is evolving, with increasing numbers of lawsuits and more comprehensive legal strategies.
Future trends in PFAS litigation are expected to focus on holding more entities accountable and expanding the scope of legal actions.
As scientific evidence linking PFAS to various health conditions strengthens, we can anticipate a rise in individual and PFAS class action lawsuits.
Legal strategies will likely become more sophisticated, with plaintiffs’ attorneys leveraging new research and expert testimony to build stronger cases.
Additionally, there may be greater collaboration between federal and state agencies to address PFAS contamination comprehensively.
These trends suggest that PFAS litigation will continue to grow, potentially leading to more substantial settlements and regulatory changes.
Maximizing the success of your PFAS thyroid disease lawsuit requires strategic legal representation and a thorough understanding of the types of compensation available.
TruLaw offers expert guidance and resources to help plaintiffs achieve the best possible outcomes.
This section outlines the types of compensation available for PFAS thyroid disease victims and explains the benefits of a contingency fee basis with instant case evaluation.
Victims of PFAS thyroid disease are entitled to various types of compensation to address the physical, emotional, and financial impact of their condition.
Understanding the full scope of compensation can help plaintiffs seek adequate redress for their suffering.
Types of compensation include:
This comprehensive compensation aims to alleviate the burden on victims and provide them with the necessary support.
TruLaw operates on a contingency fee basis, which means clients do not pay any upfront fees for legal services.
Instead, attorneys receive a percentage of the settlement or award only if the case is successful.
This approach ensures that legal representation is accessible to all victims, regardless of their financial situation.
The process begins with an instant case evaluation, where potential plaintiffs can quickly determine the viability of their lawsuit.
TruLaw’s experienced attorneys review the case details, assess the evidence, and provide guidance on the best course of action.
This initial evaluation helps victims understand their legal options and the potential for a successful outcome, ensuring they can make informed decisions about pursuing litigation.
While several class action lawsuits related to PFAS have occurred in the past, multidistrict litigation (MDL) centralized in the District of South Carolina is currently consolidating lawsuits related to PFAS contamination across 20 different federal district courts.
The primary source of PFAS contamination at military facilities is the use of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) in firefighting exercises and emergency responses.
These foams contain high levels of PFAS, leading to persistent environmental contamination in groundwater, soil, air, and surface water.
Military personnel face significant health risks due to prolonged exposure to PFAS-contaminated drinking water and soil, including increased risks of cancer, endocrine disruption, and immune system impairment.
Families residing near contaminated military bases are also at risk of PFAS exposure.
Several scientific studies have demonstrated a correlation between PFAS exposure and an increased risk of thyroid disease, with higher rates of thyroid disorders in populations exposed to elevated levels of PFAS.
The mechanisms by which PFAS contributes to thyroid disease development involve the chemicals interfering with thyroid hormone regulation and disrupting normal cellular functions.
Individuals affected by PFAS exposure can file lawsuits on several legal grounds, including product liability (if PFAS-containing products are found to be defective and harmful), negligence (if entities failed to control or contain PFAS contamination), and failure to warn (if companies did not provide sufficient warnings about the dangers of PFAS exposure).
Victims of PFAS thyroid disease are entitled to various types of compensation, including coverage for past and future medical expenses, lost wages due to inability to work during treatment and recovery, damages for pain and suffering caused by the disease and its treatment, and potentially punitive damages in cases of egregious misconduct by manufacturers.
Experienced Attorney & Legal SaaS CEO
With over 25 years of legal experience, Jessie is an Illinois lawyer, a CPA, and a mother of three. She spent the first decade of her career working as an international tax attorney at Deloitte.
In 2009, Jessie co-founded her own law firm with her husband – which has scaled to over 30 employees since its conception.
In 2016, Jessie founded TruLaw, which allows her to collaborate with attorneys and legal experts across the United States on a daily basis. This hypervaluable network of experts is what enables her to share reliable legal information with her readers!
Here, at Tru Lawsuit Info, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
To do this, we actively work to connect them with attorneys who are experts in litigating cases similar to theirs.
Would you like our help?
Tru Lawsuit Info is a reliable source of information about issues that may affect your health and safety, such as faulty products, data breaches, and environmental hazards.
Our team of experienced writers collaborates with medical professionals, lawyers, and advocates to produce informative articles, guides, and other resources that raise awareness of these topics.
Our thorough research provides consumers with access to reliable information and updates on lawsuits happening around the country. We also can connect consumers with attorneys if they need assistance.
Camp Lejeune's water contamination issue spanned several decades starting in the 1950s. Exposure to these chemicals has been linked to various serious health issues, including cancer, organ diseases, and death.
Research is increasingly suggesting a link between the use of Tylenol during pregnancy and the development of neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism and ADHD, in infants.
Legal action is being taken against manufacturers of Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF), a chemical used in fighting fires. The plaintiffs allege that exposure to the foam caused health issues such as cancer, organ damage, and birth and fertility issues.
Here, at Tru Lawsuit Info, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
To do this, we actively work to connect them with attorneys who are experts in litigating cases similar to theirs.
Would you like our help?
Tru Lawsuit info is a trusted source of information on defective products, data breaches, environmental Hazards and other threats to your health and safety.